Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 157
Filter
1.
J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep ; 11: 23247096231176216, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2323814

ABSTRACT

With the previous worldwide initial coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a notable rise in spontaneous pneumomediastinum with/without pneumothorax (SPP) has been noted. Most cases were initially reported as complications secondary to barotrauma from mechanical ventilation (MV) with COVID-19. However, with the Delta strain, starting from December 2020, there have been multiple reports of SPP. The SPP is an uncommon complication outside use of assisted ventilation with either noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) or MV. COVID-19 has been linked to higher incidence of SPP without use of NIPPV or MV. We present a series of 5 cases with a polymerase chain reaction-confirmed COVID-19 diagnostic testing whose hospital course was complicated by SPP unrelated to the use of either NIPPV or MV.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Pneumothorax , Humans , COVID-19 Testing , Respiration, Artificial
3.
Am J Case Rep ; 24: e939170, 2023 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2320757

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND Pneumomediastinum, or mediastinal emphysema, means air present inside the mediastinum. It usually presents with symptoms of chest pain and shortness of breath. Examination can be significant for crepitus along the neck area. There are many risk factors associated with pneumomediastinum, including asthma and COVID-19. Most cases of pneumomediastinum improve with conservative management, and surgery (mediastinotomy) is reserved for complicated cases with tension pneumomediastinum. CASE REPORT This is the case of a 23-year-old man who presented with chest tightness after 3.5 h of cycling. The patient did have a prior history of clinically stable asthma, with no recent exacerbation, and denied any other associative factors. Imaging was significant for pneumomediastinum. The patient was admitted for observation in the hospital and treated with supportive care, without any surgical intervention. The patient had appropriate improvement in his symptoms in 24 h. Repeat imaging showed improvement in the pneumomediastinum, and the patient was discharged to outpatient follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Our case presents a unique link between cycling and pneumomediastinum. Prolonged cycling may emerge as a risk factor for this complication. People with a previous history of pneumomediastinum should be careful to review other risk factors prior to planning long-distance bicycling. Physicians need to keep this differential diagnosis in mind when encountering a patient with similar symptoms so that a timely diagnosis is made.


Subject(s)
Asthma , COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Male , Humans , Young Adult , Adult , Mediastinal Emphysema/diagnostic imaging , Mediastinal Emphysema/complications , Bicycling , COVID-19/complications , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Asthma/complications , Chest Pain/diagnosis , Chest Pain/etiology
4.
Folia Med (Plovdiv) ; 65(2): 215-220, 2023 Apr 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2315620

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Tension pneumomediastinum is an increasingly common condition since the COVID-19 pandemic's onset. It is a life-threatening complication with severe hemodynamic instability that is refractory to catecholamines. Surgical decompression with drainage is the key point of treatment. Various surgical procedures are reported in the literature, but no cohesive approach has yet been developed. AIM: The aim was to present the available options for surgical treatment of tension pneumomediastinum, as well as the post-interventional results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine cervical mediastinotomies were performed on intensive-care unit (ICU) patients who developed a tension pneumomediastinum during mechanical ventilation. The age and sex of patients, surgical complications, pre- and post-intervention basic hemodynamic parameters, as well as oxygen saturation levels, were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 62±16 years (6 males and 3 females). No postoperative surgical complications were recorded. The average preoperative systolic blood pressure was 91±12 mmHg, the heart rate was 104±8 bpm, and the oxygen saturation level was 89±6%, while the short-term postoperative values changed to 105±6 mmHg, 101±4 bpm, and 94±5%, respectively. There was no long-term survival benefit, with a mortality rate of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical mediastinotomy is the operative method of choice in the presence of tension pneumomediastinum allowing an effective decompression of the mediastinal structures and improving the condition of the affected patients without improving the survival rate.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Male , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , COVID-19/complications , Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/surgery , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Pandemics , Heart Rate , Postoperative Complications
5.
researchsquare; 2023.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-2898287.v1

ABSTRACT

Background Patients with severe respiratory failure due to COVID–19 who are not invasively ventilated may develop severe hypoxemia due to spontaneous pneumomediastinum (PM). These patients might be harmed by invasive ventilation. Alternatively, veno − venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV–ECMO) may be utilised. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of VV–ECMO versus invasive ventilation as the initial advanced respiratory support in COVID–19 patients with acute respiratory failure due to spontaneous PM.Methods This is a retrospective cohort study performed between March 2020 and January 2022. Not invasively ventilated COVID–19 patients presented acute respiratory failure due to spontaneous PM needed invasive ventilation or VV–ECMO support were enrolled in this study. Mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) discharge at 90 days after ICU admission were the primary outcomes.Results Twenty-two patients included in this study. Thirteen patients (59%) were originally treated with invasive ventilation (Invasive ventilation group) and 9 (41%) with VV–ECMO (VV–ECMO group). VV–ECMO strategy was significantly associated with lower mortality 0.33 [95%−CI 0.12 − 0.97], P = 0.04]) (hazard ratio (HR), 0.33 [95%–confidence interval (CI) 0.12 − 0.97], P = 0.04). 5 patients of the VV–ECMO group were intubated and 8 of the invasive ventilation group were needed VV–ECMO support within 30 days. Three patients (33%) in the VV–ECMO group were discharged from ICU within 90 days compared to 1 patient (8%) in the invasive ventilation group (HR 4.71 [95%−CI 0.48 − 45.3], P = 0.18).Conclusions VV–ECMO without invasive ventilation is associated with a higher survival rate but not a reduced ICU length of stay in patients with COVID–19 acute respiratory failure due to spontaneous pneumomediastinum.


Subject(s)
Mediastinal Emphysema , Hypoxia , Respiratory Insufficiency , Respiratory Distress Syndrome
6.
BMC Infect Dis ; 23(1): 137, 2023 Mar 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2268335

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the novel coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic, a considerable number of pneumothorax (PNX)/pneumomediastinum (PNM) associated with COVID-19 have been reported, and the incidence is higher in critically ill patients. Despite using a protective ventilation strategy, PNX/PNM still occurs in patients on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). This matched case-control study aims to identify the risk factors and clinical characteristics of PNX/PNM in COVID-19. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled adult patients with COVID-19, admitted to a critical care unit from March 1, 2020, to January 31, 2022. COVID-19 patients with PNX/PNM were compared, in a 1-2 ratio, to COVID-19 patients without PNX/PNM, matched for age, gender, and worst National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ordinal scale. Conditional logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the risk factors for PNX/PNM in COVID-19. RESULTS: 427 patients with COVID-19 were admitted during the period, and 24 patients were diagnosed with PNX/PNM. Body mass index (BMI) was significantly lower in the case group (22.8 kg/m2 and 24.7 kg/m2; P = 0.048). BMI was statistically significant risk factor for PNX/PNM in univariate conditional logistic regression analysis [odds ratio (OR), 0.85; confidence interval (CI), 0.72-0.996; P = 0.044]. For patients on IMV support, univariate conditional logistic regression analysis showed the statistical significance of the duration from symptom onset to intubation (OR, 1.14; CI, 1.006-1.293; P = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Higher BMI tended to show a protective effect against PNX/PNM due to COVID-19 and delayed application of IMV might be a contributive factor for this complication.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Pneumothorax , Adult , Humans , Case-Control Studies , Pneumothorax/epidemiology , Pneumothorax/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Mediastinal Emphysema/epidemiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , COVID-19/complications
7.
Clin Imaging ; 97: 50-54, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2270150

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Patients with COVID-19 infection are frequently found to have pulmonary barotrauma. Recent work has identified the Macklin effect as a radiographic sign that often occurs in patients with COVID-19 and may correlate with barotrauma. METHODS: We evaluated chest CT scans in COVID-19 positive mechanically ventilated patients for the Macklin effect and any type of pulmonary barotrauma. Patient charts were reviewed to identify demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: The Macklin effect on chest CT scan was identified in a total of 10/75 (13.3%) COVID-19 positive mechanically ventilated patients; 9 developed barotrauma. Patients with the Macklin effect on chest CT scan had a 90% rate of pneumomediastinum (p < 0.001) and a trend toward a higher rate of pneumothorax (60%, p = 0.09). Pneumothorax was most frequently omolateral to the site of the Macklin effect (83.3%). CONCLUSION: The Macklin effect may be a strong radiographic biomarker for pulmonary barotrauma, most strongly correlating with pneumomediastinum. Studies in ARDS patients without COVID-19 are needed to validate this sign in a broader population. If validated in a broad population, future critical care treatment algorithms may include the Macklin sign for clinical decision making and prognostication.


Subject(s)
Barotrauma , COVID-19 , Lung Injury , Mediastinal Emphysema , Pneumothorax , Humans , Pneumothorax/epidemiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/diagnostic imaging , Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/epidemiology , COVID-19/complications , Barotrauma/epidemiology
9.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 26(21): 8144-8151, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2284334

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The effect of pulmonary complications of COVID-19, such as pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and subcutaneous emphysema, is still unclear. This study aimed at investigating the relationship between COVID-19 and spontaneous pneumothorax. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was conducted as a single-center retrospective study. Groups were assigned as study and control groups. The study group (n=120) included patients who were followed up in ICU and developed pneumothorax during their follow-up. The control group (n=120) included patients who did not develop a pneumothorax in ICU and who had been randomly selected using hospital records. Demographic findings, laboratory parameters, radiological findings, clinical management, patients' follow-up patterns, and survival status of the patients were recorded. RESULTS: There was a significant relationship between gender, outcome, last hospitalization, general condition, first follow-up, intubation, uptake tomography, uptake rate, CO-RADS, and involvement variables between groups (p<0.05). In the survival analysis performed in the control and study groups, a significant difference was obtained between the averages of the two groups (LogRank=3.944, p<0.05). Intubation and mortality rates of the patients who developed pneumothorax during the patient follow-ups were significantly higher than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: We found that patients diagnosed with COVID-19 who developed pneumothorax during intensive care follow-up had a higher hospital stay and intubation rate. The pneumothorax rate was also higher in follow-up methods such as noninvasive/HFO providing PEEP to the patients. The data in our study may help reducing mortality by shedding light on the early prevention and recognition of pneumothorax in critically ill patients diagnosed with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Pneumothorax , Humans , Pneumothorax/diagnostic imaging , Pneumothorax/epidemiology , Pneumothorax/etiology , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/complications , Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , Length of Stay
10.
Clin Med (Lond) ; 22(Suppl 4): 56-57, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2231257
13.
BMJ Case Rep ; 15(12)2022 Dec 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2193661

ABSTRACT

As the SARS-CoV-2 virus continues to infect millions of people worldwide, the medical profession is seeing a wide range of short-term and long-term complications of COVID-19. One lesser-known complication is that of pneumomediastinum. This is a rare, but significant, complication defined by the presence of air in the mediastinum with an incidence of 1.2 per 100 000. Described mortality rate is 30%, increasing to 60% in patients with concomitant pneumothoraces. Management of pneumomediastinum is typically conservative, but in cases of extensive subcutaneous emphysema, cardiac or airway compression, life-saving surgical decompression is necessary. We report a case of pneumomediastinum secondary to COVID-19, requiring a surgical approach not described in pneumomediastinum secondary to COVID-19. The case demonstrates the importance of prompt diagnosis and management, as well as the potential for good clinical outcome in selected patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Pneumothorax , Humans , COVID-19/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Mediastinal Emphysema/diagnostic imaging , Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/adverse effects , Pneumothorax/complications
14.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 102(1): e32605, 2023 Jan 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2191119

ABSTRACT

Current evidence suggests that intrathoracic gas effusions (pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax) may be observed among COVID-19 patients even without mechanical ventilation. Here, we report 9 patients who developed spontaneous intrathoracic gas effusions in the absence of mechanical ventilation. The incidence of spontaneous intrathoracic gas effusions is low at 0.5% in hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the absence of respiratory support. Two patients (22.2%) had spontaneous pneumomediastinum, with or without subcutaneous emphysema. Three patients (33.3%) had pneumomediastinum associated with pneumothorax, with or without subcutaneous emphysema, and 4 patients (44.4%) had spontaneous pneumothorax. The Pneumothorax was unilateral in 66.6% of cases (6/9) but without location preference. Five of our patients were smokers, of whom 80% had isolated spontaneous pneumothorax. Other comorbidities included pulmonary tuberculosis in a single patient, diabetes in 2 patients and arterial hypertension in 1 patient. None of the patients had respiratory comorbidities. All of our patients were male. The average duration of hospital stay was 10 days (±6.63). All patients required oxygen therapy. Three patients (33.3%) with spontaneous pneumothorax required chest drainage. The evolution was favorable in 6 patients (66.7%) and worse in 3 cases (33.3%). The respiratory manifestations of COVID-19 have been stereotyped. Intrathoracic effusions may also be signs of COVID-19 with varying prognoses, or even the only presentation of the disease. This should be considered in clinical practice, and doctors are encouraged to request a SARS-CoV-2 test in this situation. Further investigations with a larger sample size are needed to identify the prognostic factors in COVID-19 patients with gas effusions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Pneumothorax , Subcutaneous Emphysema , Humans , Male , Female , COVID-19/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Pneumothorax/etiology , Pneumothorax/therapy , Pneumothorax/epidemiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , Subcutaneous Emphysema/etiology
16.
Crit Care ; 26(1): 350, 2022 11 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2115659

ABSTRACT

Spontaneous pneumomediastinum (SP) has been described early during the COVID-19 pandemic in large series of patients with severe pneumonia, but most patients were receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) at the time of SP diagnosis. In this retrospective multicenter observational study, we aimed at describing the prevalence and outcomes of SP during severe COVID-19 with pneumonia before any IMV, to rule out mechanisms induced by IMV in the development of pneumomediastinum.Among 549 patients, 21 patients (4%) developed a SP while receiving non-invasive respiratory support, after a median of 6 days [4-12] from ICU admission. The proportion of patients requiring IMV was similar. However, the time to tracheal intubation was longer in patients with SP (6 days [5-13] vs. 2 days [1-4]; P = 0.00002), with a higher first-line use of non-invasive ventilation (n = 11; 52% vs. n = 150; 28%; P = 0.02). The 21 patients who developed a SP had persisting signs of severe lung disease and respiratory failure with lower ROX index between ICU admission and occurrence of SP (3.94 [3.15-5.55] at admission vs. 3.25 [2.73-4.02] the day preceding SP; P = 0.1), which may underline potential indirect signals of Patient-self inflicted lung injury (P-SILI).In this series of critically ill COVID-19 patients, the prevalence of SP without IMV was not uncommon, affecting 4% of patients. They received more often vasopressors and had a longer ICU length of stay, as compared with their counterparts. One pathophysiological mechanism may potentially be carried out by P-SILI related to a prolonged respiratory failure, as underlined by a delayed use of IMV and the evolution of the ROX index between ICU admission and the day preceding SP.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Respiratory Insufficiency , Humans , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/therapy , Pandemics , Critical Illness/epidemiology , Critical Illness/therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Mediastinal Emphysema/epidemiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/therapy , Respiration, Artificial , Retrospective Studies
17.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 58(11)2022 Oct 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2090278

ABSTRACT

For COVID-19 pneumonia, many manifestations such as fever, dyspnea, dry cough, anosmia and tiredness have been described, but differences have been observed from person to person according to age, pulmonary function, damage and severity. In clinical practice, it has been found that patients with severe forms of infection with COVID-19 develop serious complications, including pneumomediastinum. Although two years have passed since the beginning of the pandemic with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and progress has been made in understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the COVID-19 infection, there are also unknown factors that contribute to the evolution of the disease and can lead to the emergence some complications. In this case report, we present a patient with COVID-19 infection who developed a massive spontaneous pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema during hospitalization, with no pre-existing lung pathology and no history of smoking. The patient did not get mechanical ventilation or chest trauma, but the possible cause could be severe alveolar inflammation. The CT results highlighted pneumonia in context with SARS-CoV-2 infection affecting about 50% of the pulmonary area. During hospitalization, lung lesions evolved 80% pulmonary damage associated with pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema. After three months, the patient completely recovered and the pneumomediastinum fully recovered with the complete disappearance of the lesions. Pneumomediastinum is a severe and rare complication in COVID-19 pneumonia, especially in male patients, without risk factors, and an early diagnosis can increase the chances of survival.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Subcutaneous Emphysema , Humans , Male , Mediastinal Emphysema/diagnosis , Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , COVID-19/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Subcutaneous Emphysema/etiology , Subcutaneous Emphysema/complications
18.
Korean J Radiol ; 21(5): 541-544, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2089767

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia is a recent outbreak in mainland China and has rapidly spread to multiple countries worldwide. Pulmonary parenchymal opacities are often observed during chest radiography. Currently, few cases have reported the complications of severe COVID-19 pneumonia. We report a case where serial follow-up chest computed tomography revealed progression of pulmonary lesions into confluent bilateral consolidation with lower lung predominance, thereby confirming COVID-19 pneumonia. Furthermore, complications such as mediastinal emphysema, giant bulla, and pneumothorax were also observed during the course of the disease.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/complications , Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumothorax/etiology , Adult , Betacoronavirus , Blister , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , China , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Coronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/diagnostic imaging , Disease Progression , Humans , Lung/pathology , Male , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnostic imaging , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
19.
Cir Cir ; 90(4): 543-547, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2067554

ABSTRACT

Several alterations that, due to their pathophysiology, are collectively classified as "air leaks", have been rare complications of COVID-19 pneumonia. In the context of infection by SARS-CoV-2, the debate arises as to whether these are classified as spontaneous or secondary, since the multiple mechanisms of pulmonary structural damage that COVID-19 entails condition lung fragility in a patient in short time. For the above, we presents the case of a 36-year-old female patient with COVID-19 complicated with pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema in order to illustrate and discuss these complications.


Diversas alteraciones que, por su fisiopatología, son clasificadas en conjunto como «fugas de aire¼, han sido complicaciones raras de la neumonía por COVID-19. Respecto a la infección por SARS-CoV-2, se plantea el debate de si estas se clasifican como espontáneas o secundarias, ya que los múltiples mecanismos de daño estructural pulmonar que conlleva la COVID-19 condicionan fragilidad pulmonar en corto lapso. Por lo anterior, se expone el caso de una paciente de 36 años con COVID-19 complicada con neumomediastino y enfisema subcutáneo con el objetivo de ilustrar y discutir dichas complicaciones.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Subcutaneous Emphysema , Adult , COVID-19/complications , Female , Humans , Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Subcutaneous Emphysema/etiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/adverse effects
20.
Cir Cir ; 90(4): 540-542, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2067553

ABSTRACT

SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) disease is an infection caused by a new emerging coronavirus, the most common clinical manifestations include fever, dry cough, dyspnea, chest pain, fatigue, and myalgia, sometimes it may present with atypical manifestations such as spontaneous pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum that occur in a minority of patients. We report a case of spontaneous pneumopericardium in a 60-year-old male, without comorbidities or a history of trauma, with pneumonia due to SARS-CoV-2.


La enfermedad por SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) es una infección causada por un nuevo coronavirus emergente. Las manifestaciones clínicas más comunes incluyen fiebre, tos seca, disnea, dolor de pecho, fatiga y mialgias. En ocasiones puede presentarse con manifestaciones atípicas, como neumotórax espontáneo y neumomediastino, que ocurren en una minoría de pacientes. Reportamos un caso de neumopericardio espontáneo en un varón de 60 años, sin comorbilidad ni antecedente de traumatismo, con neumonía por SARS-CoV-2.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Pneumopericardium , Pneumothorax , COVID-19/complications , Humans , Male , Mediastinal Emphysema/diagnostic imaging , Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , Middle Aged , Pneumopericardium/complications , Pneumopericardium/etiology , Pneumothorax/etiology , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL